Posts Tagged ‘rob’

Simple Foods for Modern Times

Monday, April 2nd, 2012

from our team monday

Real simple is the name of a magazine.  It is also a way of life, a goal for many and a philosophy described so ably by Henry David Thoreau.   Given the complexity we all face today it is certainly a compelling idea.

At Attune Foods, we spend a lot of time talking about “real simple” as it relates to food.  Our simple foods are comprised of very few ingredients and those ingredients are things that you can understand.   The process in which they are made is pretty simple as well – steam grains, roll them flat, and toast them.  To some of our simple food we add a few mix-ins like raisins, flax seeds or berries, but it is pretty straightforward.  So simple, that if you had the inclination, you could make them at home.

We love that idea. But it does present a challenge when you think of “innovating”.  In food, innovation generally means putting ingredients through a new process or building a food that has new properties – a pizza that does well in the freezer, a cereal that is great in a bar, a cake that tastes as good as homemade.  To do these things successfully generally requires a process that is in fact, less simple and uses more ingredients, more processing, and usually some special packaging.  The truly great products figure out ways to do it with as little as possible.  A great potato chip has three ingredients – potato, oil, and salt.  Hard to beat that.  Yes, it may not be super healthy, but the process and ingredients are understandable and if you are concerned about the fat or calories, you can simply eat fewer of them.  The more “innovative” potato chip would be something like Pringles – which have more than double the number of ingredients (8 in the original), yet still scores low on the health front, but has the advantage of a longer shelf life, and more efficient packaging technology.

So when we began our recent innovation work we started with the idea of dis-innovation by looking back to the origin of the cereal category which was conceived of to deliver healthy grains in a convenient package.  When Samuel Coltrin created Uncle Sam Cereal 104 years ago, he happened upon a recipe that we think is close to perfect.  Wheat berries, Flax seed, barley malt and salt.  Amazingly, he created a cereal that today stands at the head of the class:  10g of fiber, 7 g of protein high levels of omega 3’s and less than 1 g of sugar.

Variety, however, may be what he was missing so to innovate we decided to look at simple combinations of alternative grains to provide additional benefits.  Our Erewhon organic cereals were created with the same idea in mind.  Erewhon Corn Flakes have two ingredients (organic corn, and sea salt); Crispy Brown Rice Gluten Free cereal, three (Organic Brown Rice, Organic Brown Rice syrup, and sea salt); our “innovations” may stretch to 4!

In the words of Thoreau: “Live each season as it passes; breathe the air, drink the drink, taste the fruit, and resign yourself to the influences of each.”  On those crazy days when you need 7 grains, go ahead and mix a few of ours, enjoy the process, and you will be living “real simple”.

Rob  photoBe well!

Rob signature

Rob

Check out my latest posts here

Regulating Food

Monday, March 19th, 2012

from our team monday

I don’t like the idea of government regulating my food.  My guess is that most Americans feel the same way.  I also don’t like the idea of levying special taxes on foods that today might be considered “bad”.

Eating is fundamentally a very personal experience, and we should be able to decide what and how we want to eat.  That said, we should also be able to make that choice based on clear, and understandable information and do our best as an industry and a nation to educate consumers about how nutrition impacts health.

The food industry, in its drive for profits, has done almost everything possible to cloud consumer information and in many cases has fought against the most basic consumer rights to information.   The industry has fought against country of origin labeling.  They have fought against GMO labeling.  They have fought against labeling improvements proposed by many consumer organizations.  The solutions proffered today tweak the status quo and preserve a shield of mystery.

Last week the head of marketing of one of the largest food companies in the world (Pepsico) said in an interview (as it relates to their decision to add water to orange juice)  “we have lost perspective here on the primary reason we are in business, which is to make money”.

If this is the primary reason they are in business then at the very least there must be more transparency in labeling so that consumers have the chance to make well informed decisions. What really is in my orange juice?

Mortgage regulations in the wake of the housing bubble have become more transparent to prevent the kind of abuses that almost cratered our country.  I think it is time for the food labels to become transparent as well.  Standardized serving sizes would be a good place to start.  And maybe including ALL the ingredients would be a good idea.

Food companies’ first responsibility is to their consumers, then the environment and finally to the bottom line.  If companies abide by this idea, then their customers will live happy and healthy lives.

 

Rob  photoBe well!

Rob signature

Rob

Check out my latest posts here

Is Food Really More Expensive?

Monday, February 6th, 2012

We hear from a lot of consumers today about how expensive food has become, and there is no question that the spike in commodity prices over the last two years has impacted everyone’s wallet.  That said, the trend over the last 50 years has been for lower food prices on a relative basis, and in real dollar terms we have seen very moderate growth.

The drivers of this remarkable trend in the food economy have been twofold; increased productivity (measured by output per acre) and to a larger extent, the marketing of “modern” food.   These factors are of course related and the result of a very misguided federal policy.

US agricultural policy has been driven by the corn and soybean lobby and today, as a result of their success, you will find corn, soy and their derivative products in almost every packaged food.  Since 1960 the US population has grown by 72%, while corn production has more than tripled (planting has grown about 30% and yields have tripled) and soy production has grown over six fold (planting has tripled and yields have doubled) (http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/outreach/agriculture/periodicals/chartbook/Chartbook2/Tables/Table10.pdf) .  Rest assured, Americans aren’t directly eating all that as corn on the cob and edamame.  Instead we are feeding livestock (meat consumption is up 25% over this time period) and creating an incredible array of food products with ingredients like high fructose corn syrup, and soy isolates.  In fact in your average grocery store today you will find close to 50,000 items on shelf to choose from and most are made from only 20 of the more than 20,000 edible species available on earth. (http://www.pfaf.org/user/edibleuses.aspx ).

The proliferation of products has been driven by large food companies’ need to deliver increased quarterly profits.  To do this they have focused on cost reduction which is typically done by substituting less expensive ingredients – many corn or soy based – for simpler primary foods that appeared in the original recipes.  Why make a cereal out of a true whole grain if you can do it more cheaply by making a flake from a paste of the less valuable parts of the grain – or so the thought goes.  Over the decades this trend has steadily eroded the nutritional value of our food and resulted in ingredient statements that take up a good portion of the product label.  Most of the items are there to make up for the more expensive part that has been taken out, or to add “shelf life” to the product so that the supply chain can become more efficient.  When I worked at “big food” we used to call this “slicing the salami” – you don’t notice the little changes until one day you look up and the whole thing is gone.

Consumer health has been the least important part of the equation, and is also one of the more difficult outcomes to measure.  Impacts occur over decades and finding the root causes of a health issue, like the current obesity epidemic, are difficult to pinpoint.   That said, when I recently updated the chart below, it is hard to imagine that there is not a causal relationship.

GDP Americans spend on Food v. Healthcare

* Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group;  U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; and U.S. Bureau of the Census.
* USDA Economic Research Service

Adjusted for real inflation, we are spending about twice as much on food today as we did in 1960 and about 17 times as much on health care.   That’s right 17 times as much.   Yes, food is more expensive, but it is a far cry from the cost of Lipitor.  In 1960 the average American spent $415 on food and $150 on health care. In those same (adjusted) dollars, Americans now spend $899 on food and $2584 per year on health care.

So the next time you are standing in the grocery store feeling the pinch in your wallet, realize that you can make a choice.  Spending on good quality healthy food may save you a lot of money, improve your quality of life and help get our country back on a productive path!

 

 

Rob  photoBe well!

Rob signature

Rob

Check out my latest posts here